Friday, February 25, 2011

Let's Talk About Sex. And Women. (Thoughts on Issues Related to the RH Bill.)

by Rowie Azada

I'll start by sharing three insights that struck me at different times in my life.

Insight number 1. When I was in college, we studied the Catholic doctrine on contraception, marriage, and sexuality for a Theology class. I remember thinking to myself that it was very difficult to follow the Catholic doctrine on contraception, but at the same time I was also struck by how much faith it had in the kind of love a husband and a wife could have. The only "Church-approved" methods of family planning--natural "birth control" methods--were entirely dependent on open communication lines between husband and wife, and on a husband's respect for his wife's body and her sexuality. There was also a strong concern that "a man ... may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection" (HV 17, encyclical given in 1968). There were other parts of the doctrine I had many questions about, but I thought that the emphasis on a man's respect for a woman's body was quite cool.

Insight number 2. When I was a fresh graduate, I was hired to translate for an American journalist who was doing a story on contraception in the Philippines. We visited a number of urban poor areas in the Philippines and interviewed women who had eight or more children. We asked the women why they had so many children and their answers were often along the lines of, "E kasi madalas umuuwi ang asawa ko nang lasing, kaya alam mo na ...." Many of the women we interviewed said they had tried the pill but didn't like the side effects they said the pill gave them; when asked why they didn't use a condom instead, they often said, "E ayaw kasi ng asawa ko."

Insight number 3. I read a statistic a few years ago that showed a correlation between a woman's level of education and the number of children she had: the more educated a woman was, the more likely it was that she would have less children. I don't know for certain what the cause of the correlation is, but I'm guessing that maybe a more educated woman has a surer sense of self, and therefore feels more empowered to make decisions about her entire life, including her sexuality.

========

Why do so many poorer families have so many children--often far more than they can afford? There are probably many answers to the question, but based on those interviews I did several years ago, it seems that for some families, part of the reason is the dynamic between the husband and wife, the communication--or rather, the lack of communication--about sexuality. My guess is that many women cannot say no to their husbands/sexual partners, or cannot assert their own opinions and views about sex in the bedroom.

It is a shame that in this debate, the Catholic bishops and religious have been focusing only on the issue of contraception, because I think that there is much more in Catholic doctrine that can contribute to the discussion on reproductive health. Reproductive health begins, not in public clinics or barangay health centers or in school, but first and foremost, at home, in sexual relationships. Of course, the State cannot legislate respect between sexual partners (other than prohibiting domestic abuse), but by framing the issue of reproductive health mainly as a debate about contraception, the current participants in the debate are missing the opportunity to draw attention to what I think is at least an equally important issue: the power relations between sexual partners.

Why are women in our culture unable to be frank about sex? Why are men in our culture more vocal about sex? Both are equally misinformed about sex, yet in the power relation between man and woman, the woman acquiesces to the man. Despite all theories that ours is a matriarchal society, this is one area where women lose out.

I remember the last huge art-related controversy in school, around a decade ago. A theater group wanted to stage the Vagina Monologues. However, some administrators (not priests), reacting to the play's strong language, refused to endorse it as an official school activity, and banned it from campus. The group went ahead and staged it, off campus, but the banning caused a huge uproar.

I watched the play and loved it. The next day I talked about it with some friends. "In one of the scenes," I began, "where a character started talking about her 'puerta' ..."

A male friend who had also watched it responded, "A oo, kadiri talaga yung scene na yun ...."

"Kadiri?" I said, surprised. "I thought it was so powerful, so moving ...."

"See, the thing is," I continued, "men have porn and locker room jokes to talk about sex. Women have nothing. When men talk about sex publicly, it's funny. At least, it's funny. When women talk about sex, it's 'kadiri.'"

If we want to increase reproductive health awareness, giving condoms or pills for free at health clinics might help a little. But it won't be enough. Let's go beyond this contraceptive talk. Let's talk about people. Let's talk about relationships. Let's talk about women in relationships and how we can help women speak up.

*picture from http://www.marieclaire.co.uk/

7 comments:

  1. i agree with this 100%

    ReplyDelete
  2. How about giving members of the religious the space to express their concerns about sex? I know quite a number of scholastics and priests who are sexually repressed. The jesuits who masturbate might end up having kids, just like Fr. Candelaria, because they do not have their own version of Reproductive Health.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You are so right that Church teaching on marriage - especially the love and respect the husband owes the wife, including her body - is beautiful. And you are right that in many marriages husbands (and wives) are not well-formed in their faith so that the wives do end up powerless and being used by their husbands for sex rather than engaging with mutual self-giving in a mature sexual relationship. The Church teaches BOTH "generosity in the service of life" (that is, not refusing to receive the gift of children from God for a selfish or trivial reason), AND "responsible parenthood" (that is, making sure that we have the capacity to provide for and educate our children in the fullest sense - not just academically but in the fullness of LIFE - spiritually, emotionally, intellectually, physically). We are called to be open to life but prudent and prayerful in our cooperation with the Lord in our decision whether or not to increase our family at any given time. The Church teaches that the only moral way to prevent or postpone the birth of children is using natural means, based on the fertility cycles of women (natural family planning).

    I disagree that contraception is a minor issue. Well-formed priests and religious rightly focus on the contraceptive mentality that the RH bill so starkly reflects (as well as the idea that "passing out condoms" could "help") because the introduction of widespread marital contraception into society is one of the main factors that has contributed to marriage and family breakdown in our society. The marriage act has long been (rightly) understood by the Church as BOTH unitive and procreative - BOTH bonding the couple together AND allowing God to bestow the "supreme gift of marriage" - children. Social acceptance of contraception has irrevocably separated these two functions of sex - so that sex is now seen as mainly recreational - something for people to engage in strictly (and with no deeper meaning) for personal pleasure, according to their wants but not subject to any higher law or value. Within marriage, even, sex is now seen, not as a sign of the complete and total gift of self that spouses are called to give each other, but rather an activity for each partner's personal pleasure and nothing more. This is why so many women are used as objects (and men too sometimes) even within marriage.

    The Church teaches that married couples can licitly space their children - or even in some cases avoid childbearing altogether - for serious reasons using natural family planning (NFP). NFP is often confused with what used to be known as the unreliable "rhythm method" but this is IN NO WAY the case. Modern methods of natural family planning - the sympto-thermal method, the Billings Ovulation Method, the Marquette Model of Natural Family Planning, the Creighton Method of Natural Family Planning (NaPRO), are all modern, scientifically-validated methods for couples to use to space their children, based on physical symptoms of fertility easily observed and charted by the woman. Some use modern technology such as ovulation monitors; others use different methods, but all are highly effective (much more highly effective than the old "calendar rhythm" method - as much as 99% effective at preventing pregnancy.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. (I write from a U.S. perspective but many of these methods have been validated by research internationally, especially the Billings Ovulation Method, including in China and I believe the Philippines as well).

    More importantly, natural family planning encourages couples - even couples with little education - to communicate about their sex lives and encourage respect for the woman's body and the couple's gift of fertility, which is a gift from the Lord given to husband and wife together. The process of learning natural family planning itself by all couples would go a long way toward resolving the issue of husbands' lack of respect for their wives, and wives' powerlessness over sexual relations. Every couple married in the Catholic Church should be well-versed in these methods and the theology underpinning them, and everyone in society could benefit from the healthy lifestyle choice that NFP use reflects. Many of the NFP teaching organizations are fully capable of teaching couples of all socioeconomic and educational levels and the rate of marital satisfaction in users of NFP is very high (and the divorce rate very low).

    I hope that organizations and individuals with a real interest in human dignity and the rights and good of women will come to see artificial contraception as it really is - a form of exploitation - and encourage real respect for the goodness of women's bodies and the goodness of their fertility (and the dignity of the children they bear), especially through the promotion of natural family planning.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ms. Azada, thank you for openning up this discussion. Pam, thanks for sharing your thoughts. I'll need to re-read it later to digest it fully.

    1)"men have porn and locker room jokes to talk about sex. Women have nothing. When men talk about sex publicly, it's funny. At least, it's funny. When women talk about sex, it's 'kadiri.'"
    Porn is a huge problem; divisive of marriages here in the US. It destroys communication between spouses and isolates them from each other. It also leads to risky and often criminal behavior.
    When I lived in the Philippines men would talk and joke about sex while drinking and would end up in massage parlors paying prostitutes for their services.
    Porn or “locker room jokes” are hardly the way to talk about sex and women respectfully.
    "E kasi madalas umuuwi ang asawa ko nang lasing, kaya alam mo na ...."
    This sounds pretty close to marital rape doesn’t it?

    Yes we do need to talk about people and relationships. We need to talk about intimacy. We need to talk about love and responsibility.

    2) My Catholic faith teaches me that the value of a person does not come from the state or from another person but directly from God (who creates each of us uniquely in his image). Creation is ongoing and as His creatures we are to cooperate with God in His creation (Obey the will of the Father). Openness to new life in marriage is surrendering to divine providence. It is not ignorance or irresponsibility but reverence for motherhood (the meaning of matrimony). It is an act of faith.
    Natural family planning (NFP) does not contradict but conforms to the natural order. It does require sacrifice in terms of temporary continence. But that sacrifice together with prayer fosters marital fidelity (a marital grace).
    Artificial contraception, on the other hand, is taking the fruit from the tree of good and evil (the natural law) and eating it (making it your own). It’s not “God’s will be done” but mine. I control the end result for my benefit. How can marriage survive this selfishness?

    3) Catholic love is pure of heart. It seeks the good of the other and does not demand a response. Sacrifice is not a burden; it is not resentful. Sacrifice is a privilege that comes from loving. This selfless love is what binds a couple and unites their soul. Their communion is a foretaste of heaven.

    I intend to continue with some keys to a successful marriage and the need to mobilize the church laity in my next post here.

    ReplyDelete